Authors Posts by Phillip J Watt

Phillip J Watt

Phillip J Watt lives in Australia. He best identifies as a ‘self-help guide’. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.

18 232

The left/right paradigm is an illusion of choice because both parties work for the same employers. No, it’s not the people either, like it should be. It has now been well exposed that regardless of who we vote for, the governments of the western world still follow orders from their corporate and elite masters. Therefore, an ex CIA officer says that for Trump to be considered the real deal he needs to remove money from the political spectrum and re-balance the power back to the people, where it belongs.

The only way to do this is by instituting a series of radical policy transformations – such as to the monetary, banking, education, tax, media and legal systems, but most importantly implement electoral reform. What this means is dissolving the political duopoly through disassembling the party system, enacting profound changes to the way elections are held, removing private funding from candidate campaigns and ensuring candidates represent their community needs and wishes instead of corporate and other interests.

So with this is mind, it really doesn’t matter who is elected as the next President in the US (or Prime Minister in Australia) unless they’re prepared to undertake the changes which guarantee that the true needs of the people and the environment are represented.

This short documentary discusses how Australia in particular (and the world in general) has been hijacked by big money, as well as three simple steps to restore the power back to the people and implement the above reforms.

The US Presidential Race

So what is the likelihood of these reforms happening in America? Well let’s take a look at Sanders and what he stands for. He certainly has called out some of the seriously toxic issues with Wall Street and the banking system, but he has also been given the opportunity 8 times to put forward an Electoral Reform Act.

Did he accept? No.

He has also neglected to call out Clinton as a warmonger and consistent committer of crime and treason, and even vowed to work with her (if he fails at obtaining the democratic nomination) to beat the Republican nominee Donald Trump. All this convincingly points to the allegation that he is either controlled opposition, or just ignorant of what the American system truly needs and the death and destruction that the establishment puppet Clinton would actually do to the US, and the rest of the world.

This is such a critical time in humanity’s history, so Sanders should be standing up for the truth at all costs.

Then there’s Trump. If he’s serious about making America great again, then surely he must understand that the sell out of politics is one of the biggest causes of the cancer in the system. Therefore, will he take electoral and other reforms seriously and do what’s right for the American people if he secures the Presidency?

We’re about to find out. A former CIA officer, writer, political analyst and activist, Mr. Robert David Steele, has written an open letter to Trump in Counterpunch outlining seven basic steps he needs to take to do right by his campaign and the American people. Without more or less taking these exact steps, Trump will clearly illustrate that he is not out for the people of America, but for himself and the corporate elite.

A few of the steps are a Virtual Constitutional Convention (participatory and televised constitutional debate), an Unemployment Workshop (shaming banks and corporations and exposing real unemployment figures), ending all income taxes, and an Electoral Reform Summit (12 steps to reinstalling real democracy in America).

An Electoral Reform, believes Steele, is an absolute necessity for revitalizing a true democratic process in America and therefore transferring the power back to the people. Being one of the leaders in electoral reform research and design, he states that the following 12 layers are as equally important when enacting such legislation:


Final Thoughts

Sanders had his opportunity, eight times, to enact electoral reform, so we know he’s not the man who would enact the real change that America needs. But in consideration of Trump, it’s not as clear cut.

There are a lot of Trump fans – even in the truth and freedom movements – particularly because of his politically incorrect approach and his exposure of some of the truths about the world, including the true legacy of Hillary. It is no secret that he has many views and traits which are highly concerning, however, many believe that he is the real deal and will actually be a good thing for the American economy and America as a whole.

But is this actually true? Of course both Trump and Sanders are much better options than Clinton – as sad as that might be – as she is the clear choice of the shadow order. Yet, many people also allege that Trump is just another power hungry narcissist, or even worse, controlled opposition too.

Alternatively, is Trump actually a wild card with a wild mouth designed to tap into the dissent of the American people? Could all of the ‘Trump Show’ be an orchestrated approach to gather as much support as possible to really take on the elite power structure after he gets into power?

The only way we’ll really know is if he chooses to undertake the electoral reform that America, and basically the rest of the world, desperately needs. He has been called out, so the ball is in his court.

And one more thing: we should always remember that if the millions of Sanders and Trump supporters would stop fighting and peacefully unite, America would be taken back into the hands of the people near overnight.

The following video is the latest interview with Robert David Steele. Enjoy and share.

About the author:

Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written and film work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. You can visit pushingthetippingpoint for more, follow him on Facebook, watch his interviews with an array of inspiring guests at his YouTube Channel, or visit his website.

Humanity has come to significant point in its history. We are on the precipice of a serious economic disaster, a system-blowing transformation, or both. Even if a fiat-debt implosion occurred of an unprecedented magnitude, we do have the solutions and capacity to respond in a way that will minimize the impacts and transform our reality into something better. It will take some serious people power though, so, will we choose to act before this happens, or will we wait until the masses are subject to further suffering?

Not that this isn’t happening already. The middle class is eroding, millions can’t afford to feed themselves, many people are underemployed or working multiple part-time jobs and barely scraping through, and those subject to poverty, homelessness and other disadvantage is increasing.

Social unrest is manifesting as a result. More and more people are being inflicted with this pain which has propelled the wave of support for the far left US representative, Sanders, and the far right representative, Trump. On the other hand, Clinton is obviously a face of the status quo and that is clear as day for anyone who has any idea about how the corporate oligarchy works.

Yet the divide between the supporters of Trump and Sanders is frighteningly counter-productive; if they actually united and together stood against the crony capitalists, socialism for the rich policies, banksterism, the corporatocracy and a corrupted money supply, then instead of fruitlessly and senselessly fighting each other, the US and the world over would actually have a chance of transforming the system into one which has dealt with the core problems and is designed to meet the needs of our human family and our natural systems.

As a united force, the people should have sorted out these blatant issues a long time ago. Because we are free to explore and play like never before, the masses have unfortunately become selfish, ignorant, inactive and downright lazy. This freedom is somewhat illusory though because it is within the context of ideological warfare, a corrupted money supply and increasingly overreaching government policy. In any case, when we compare our quality of life and opportunities in general to the history of what we call civilized society, we have it pretty good.

That doesn’t mean it’s true freedom, though. That doesn’t mean we can’t do better too.

Some people like to call our current state of human affairs, ‘free-range fascism.’ Given our enslavement to debt and the encroaching and unethical erosion of our natural sovereign rights, this is no doubt true.

The collective mindscape of humanity has also been shaped and deceived by many forces, such as the propaganda matrix-media, informational warfare, a divide and conquer strategy, materialistic ideology, consumerist distractions, feigned scarcity, political sell-outs, a ruling corporatocracy, a disconnection from nature, fear used as a weapon, worries of not fitting in and societal programming in general.

The list goes on.

Yet, we must once again acknowledge it is in the context of one of the greatest periods of freedom the people have ever experienced. That’s a good thing. But we also need to understand that we are subjects of a system that is specifically designed to be beneficial for the money makers, the oligarchs, the corporatocracy, and the political elite, whilst the rest of us are left in a constant battle with each other just to survive.

It simply doesn’t need to be this way.

Sure, we have come a long way and have made some amazing progress, however, if we so choose we could eliminate structural violence – such as poverty, homelessness and other socio-economic disadvantages – nearly overnight. That’s because they are direct products of a system that could be designed in more intelligent and ethical ways.

Simply put, this current model, if not the sole cause, is at the least the primary amplifier of all this dysfunction, so if we change it so that governments (i.e. the people) are no longer enslaved to debt, then an honest money supply and debt-free money creation could actually be used to resolve the plethora of socioeconomic and environmental issues that we face today.

In addition, all those insane profits generated from the banking and finance industry could be ethically invested in the right way.

Yet we’re led to believe that this is the way that things have to be; we’ve been conditioned to accept that the way our economic structure is designed is out of necessity. But this simply isn’t true.

Most people including politicians, bureaucrats, social commentators, journalists, spiritual leaders, celebrities, other famous personalities and laymen alike, don’t even know how the money supply works. For example, did you know that money is created out of nothing?

That’s right, if you go to a bank, they just create it and then deposit it in your account. They don’t get it from their vault, they don’t borrow it from anywhere else, they just simply manifest it by entering it into their accounting sheets. Then as you pay it back with interest, they destroy the money they created but keep the interest for themselves.

If this sounds insane, you’re right.

We should be asking as a people: with all the ridiculous profits that are generated from the banking sector, why isn’t this mechanism publicly owned so that all that money can be invested into social programs, infrastructure, environmental protection, energy alternatives and other necessary social services? Why aren’t the governments of the world (i.e. the employees of the people) creating this money, instead of allowing private families and institutions to create it and then make a profit?

Why aren’t we seriously, as a collective, taking responsibility for this role? Shouldn’t ‘money creation’ be used for the benefit of all of us and the environment, not just a small few?

Did you know it didn’t used to be like this? Did you know the banking dynasty have long attempted to control the creation of money and were ultimately successful when the ‘private’ Federal Reserve Bank was created in 1913? Did you know that JFK reversed this so the government could manage the creation of money, but when he was assassinated six months later the new President signed it back into law?

Did you know that the Australian Commonwealth Bank used to be a publicly owned central bank which was the exact model that could pay off national debt, spur economic growth, fund huge infrastructure projects, finance ethical energy industry, resolve entrenched poverty and transition the economy into one of debt-free prosperity?

This bank was managed by Denison Miller, who after a decade or so of creating money out of nothing for the benefit of the Australian people, including funding WWI requirements, allegedly died unexpectedly of ‘heart disease’ in 1923. Suspiciously, this bank was then assigned as an arm of the Bank of England (which was a privately owned and controlled central bank) with a ‘new’ committee selected to run the bank’s operations.

The same pattern of the death of people who support a debt-free money supply, as well as the systemic destruction of publicly owned money creation, has appeared all over the world.

Coincidence? You decide. What’s really important though is that we all understand how money is created, who truly benefits, why we have the system we have today and what alternatives there are.

Can you now imagine a reality where central banking is owned and controlled for public benefit?

Did you know there has been one running in North Dakota since 1919, which has proven conclusively to be more profitable and advantageous for its local economy than a privately owned system? Did you know that a public central bank could pay off the unbelievable mountains of government debt and take back the control the money supply by simply retiring the banking families and institutions who currently benefit from it?

Did you know the impending global financial crisis of 2016-2017 can be avoided by the government issuing debt-free money to lower the private debt issue? This would be called a modern-debt jubilee, also known as quantitative easing (QE) for the people (instead of QE for a corrupt and destructive banking and finance sector). It could literally transition the world into an intelligent way to manage our monetary system.

Furthermore, any insolvent institutions (because of their participation in an unethical and unchecked speculative casino), such as private banks and otherwise, could either be allowed to fail or even potentially nationalized, like has been done many times in the past. We have to remember, most of the world’s so-called money is just numbers on a screen; we can organize it however we like to rectify the imbalances and evolve the fiat system into one that actually works.

For those who believe this approach is socialism, you’re wrong. It’s called intelligence.

For those who believe it would cause hyperinflation, you’re wrong too. The ebb and flow of money en masse could be mathematically balanced.

For those who believe that the only way to move forward is by replacing fiat money with a gold or precious metal standard, you’re also wrong. I do sympathize with you, however this new system is logically, mathematically and ethically justifiable, so I hope you can see that humanity’s future is more important than your personal investments in this market.

For those who don’t trust governments to manage a nation’s money supply; well, that’s fair enough. The governments of the world have proven convincingly that they are incapable of being effective employees of the people, but it doesn’t need to continue this way.

Instead, we need transparency and accountability of our governments like never before. The beautiful aspect of this approach though is that it has the potential to be managed independently of politics through a bitcoin like algorithm.

In any case, this is the single most important area that we should all be focusing on, including the plethora of so-called charities, to rectify the injustices of our world. If we did, society would dramatically change the better in record time. It’s just so sad that we have been conditioned to think that the system has to be the way it is, because this is utterly and harmfully false.

Moreover, the following interview with Ellen Brown, author of The Public Bank Solution: From Austerity to Prosperity, is a great place to learn more about the public banking solution. It could be applied not just to central banks, but the entire banking sector, too. Given their proven fraudulent, unethical and greedy nature, I don’t think we’d find too many opposed to this approach. For more information, please watch it, as well as share it; being educated about this is the first step of many to resolve so many of the unjust problems we are faced with.

About the author:

Phillip J. Watt lives on the Mid North Coast of NSW Australia. His written and film work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Visit his website pushingthetippingpoint for more. You can also follow Phillip on Facebook, watch his interviews with an array of inspiring guests at his YouTube Channel, or visit his personal development website vitalityguidance.


The ignorant vilification and unethical suppression of natural, plant-based approaches to medical issues of both a mental and physical nature has long been exposed for the world to see.

​However, usually the proponents of pharmaceutically-derived mechanistic medicine point to the high success of the industry, but considering that in the US alone around 290 people die from prescription drugs each day and over 250 thousand people are dying from medical errors each year, this is simply not true.

Discovery article makes it clear why medical errors are the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States of America:

People don’t just die from bacteria and heart plaque, they die from communication breakdowns, fragmented healthcare, diagnostic mistakes, and over-dosing,” said Martin Makary, a professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore and lead author of the study.

They also refer to the suspicious lack of reporting of medical errors that the US and other governments of the world fail to publicise:

Along with more than 100 other nations, the United States uses a system for collecting national health statistics — recommended by the World Health Organization — that does not keep track of medical errors.

This obviously brings the entire medical paradigm into question. Of course there have been many amazing successes from the modern approach to medical care, such as surgery and some pharmaceuticals. These tools have been an invaluable addition to humanity, yet how do we know which so-called modern medicines are actually worthy to disperse at large and which are not?

How do we know when a really important medicine has been developed in comparison to a pill that is primarily for profit?

How do we know when a pharma drug is unncessary because there are more natural and effective remedies available?

When we consider the corruption and collusion that exists within an industry that has been monopolised as part of the corporatocracy, it really is difficult to know. As I spelled out in a previous article:

Anybody with any knowledge on the medical industry will know that it has long been corrupted by big money and big pharma. It is important that we start off with this established truth, because we have to understand that the pharmaceutical-industrial complex will one day be looked at by the mainstream mentality as we now look at the tobacco industry: deceptive, fraudulent, criminal and unethical.

To crystallize this point, in the same article I refer to the great journalism provided in a Collective Evolution article:

In the past few years more professionals have come forward to share a truth that, for many people, proves difficult to swallow. One such authority is Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.

Dr. Horton recently published a statement declaring that a lot of published research is in fact unreliable at best, if not completely false.

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

In the same article, another confronting truth is quoted by Dr. Marcia Angell, a longtime medical journal editor:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”

Keeping this in mind, when we combine it with the serious concerns that many truth-seekers have regarding the profit-before-morality model that has slithered its way into the various control-systems which influence every aspect of our lives, it becomes clear that the medical-industrial complex and our pursuit for effective health-care needs to be immediately tabled for an open, transparent and unbiased investigation to occur.

Seriously, how long can we as a society allow this dysfunction to harm not just ourselves, but our kids too?

How long will the masses just pretend that tribal cultures didn’t have access to a plethora of plant medicines which heal and develop the mind, body and soul?

How long will governments practically ignore the abundant clinical proof that meditation is both a preventative and prescriptive tool for ill-health?

Simply, there are many natural, plant-based medicines that have been clinically proven to be a highly effective tool for healing the body and growing the mind. Many of these substances are illegal, however, which is just another reason why the war-on-drugs has been an epic failure.

As I explained at length in an earlier article titled “The Problem is Drug Law, Not Drugs”:

It is clear that many governments of the world have failed to truly accept some extremely important facts around dealing with the substances that make their way through our communities. Examples include:

  • When people are told not to do something, some of them are going to do it anyway, regardless of the risks to their health;
  • There are substances which have been made illegal that have been clinically proven to provide strong provide strong therapeutic and developmental effects;
  • Many people are using drugs as escapism from a cultural existential crisis which is amplified by the soul-numbing materialistic and consumerist ideologies;
  • Humans will never be stopped from exploring their consciousness and therefore appropriate regulation and education policies need to be put in place to properly care for the people that politicians were elected to protect; and

It’s not just so-called illegal substances that are high in therapeutic and developmental potential, other basic ingredients such as bicarbonate soda have been shown to help the body to heal itself, even of cancerous tumours. Various herbs are also on the list of helpful ingredients that combat illness.

In any case, regardless of the many negative impacts that the war-on-drugs has subjected to our individual and collective health, the longer we allow the governments of the world to continue to spread ignorance and fear towards what really are ancient, well-established and clinically-proven approaches to caring for ourselves, the longer we allow the corporatisation of our system to run rampant and the longer the potential benefits to our society are missed opportunities.

In addition, the best approach to health is preventative care. That means along with tools such as meditation, eating nutritious and natural foods will always help to maintain the balance of the mind and body.

Final Thoughts

The truth is that the corrupted pharmaceutical-industrial complex and their increasingly toxic medicines, as well as a prescriptive instead of a preventative medical model, has hijacked our approach to health-care and treatment. This is a world that we have consented to; the sooner we stand up as a people and demand that it change, the sooner we will reconnect with the natural therapies and re-nourish our collective spirit.

Richard Dawkins, who hilariously refuses to expand his consciousness beyond the child’s play of the classical world, said: “There is no alternative medicine. There is only medicine that works and medicine that doesn’t work”. This is something that we can no doubt agree with, so let’s hope that as a species we can finally show some intelligence and morality by calling out this toxic approach to health and vitality and open up the global gates to a valid investigation into the benefits of all substances, both natural and designed.

Furthermore, the following short video discusses some simple techniques for meditation. If you’re feeling stressed, anxious, sad or angry in general, or if you’ve got a persistent physical health issue that just won’t go away, meditation has the potential to effectively and efficiently mitigate dysfunctional mental states and poor health in general. Enjoy and please share.


Phillip J. Watt lives on the Mid North Coast of NSW Australia. His written and film work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook, watch his interviews with an array of inspiring guests at his YouTube Channel or visit his personal development website.

mind affects your body

Emotions are a rich aspect of being human. We should honor our unique capacity to experience the complexity of humanity’s emotional spectrum, instead of bashing those which we sometimes might consider ‘bad’.

There are no strictly ‘good’ or ‘bad’ emotions. Fear for example, is a necessity for survival. Anger is necessary for engaging the pursuit of justice. Sadness helps us to understand the various loves and ideals we have in life.

Yet we do live in a duality of positive and negative spin. Both parts make a whole. So there are emotions that we process as more positive, like ‘happiness’, or more negative, like ‘grief’, yet both play a necessary role in helping us to learn and grow within the earthly context we find ourselves.

The Difference between Emotions and Feelings

There are many academic and anecdotal variations for what are considered primary and secondary emotions, which can be further explored in this article. Personally I like to look at it simply within the context of duality, meaning the two primary emotions are Joy and Fear, or Love and Hate.

Every other emotion would then be a complex mixture of these two.

Yet regardless of what we prefer to label as primary emotions, there appears to be a lot of confusion over the difference between emotions and feelings. As I described in a previous article:

“Everybody has the same emotions, yet we all have different feelings. These two human states are distinct not only because they are processed in different areas of the brain, but because emotions are primarily physical, whilst feelings are mostly mental constructs.

Our feelings are a mixture of our emotions, beliefs, philosophies, thoughts and memories. All these aspects come together to not just influence the emotions that we have, but also determine how we ‘feel’ about what is going on in our world. Therefore, understanding the difference between our emotions and feelings is critical to contextualising our emotions into the bigger pictures of our lives.”

A fantastic analysis of this difference is provided in this article. Here is an excerpt:

“Emotions originate in the subcortical regions of the brain, the amygdala and the ventromedial prefrontal cortices, and create biochemical reactions in the body altering your physical state which originally helped our species survive by producing quick reactions to threats and rewards. Emotional reactions are coded in our genes and are universally similar across all humans and even other species…

Feelings originate in the neocortical regions of the brain, are mental associations and reactions to emotions, and are subjectively influenced by personal experience, beliefs, and memories. A feeling is the mental portrayal of what’s going on in your body when you have an emotion, and is the byproduct of your brain perceiving and assigning meaning to the emotion. Feelings follow emotion, involve cognitive input, are usually below conscious awareness, and cannot be measured scientifically.”

Therefore, what we would usually consider as an emotion is most likely a mixture of energy that results in a ‘feeling’. This is because our general experience is not just an emotional reaction, but also an experience involving a complex arrangement of the various layers of our mind and body.

In addition, when we refer to someone as emotionally mature, what we’re really referring to is their greater mastery of their response to their emotions, or their ‘feelings’. In this sense, the higher the awareness we have of the energy that we process within us, the higher our power to heal and grow ourselves.

Healing and Growth

When someone says they’re feeling bad, that means their overall response or reaction to their emotions makes them feel negative. The opposite is also true; when we say we feel good, it means that the emotions we’re experiencing are being processed in accordance with certain beliefs, memories and other energy into a positive psychological experience.

Of course if we’re grieving heavily or in a desperate state of fear, it will be unlikely that we’ll be feeling ‘good’, but we can still feel content with the right type of philosophy. In any case, those experiences are the rarity, not the norm. Our standard state of mind and heart is simply one in which we choose how to respond to the world.

We have the power, which is why we should design empowered and enlightened philosophies on life. If we’re successful, they will productively guide our engagement with both the challenges and ecstasies that we’re gifted each day.

That’s not to take anything away, however, from the significant influence our past can sometimes have on our present. We all know that trauma, for example, has a substantial impact on both our physical hardware and mental software. If this trauma occurs in the early stages of brain development, then the neurology is fundamentally wired in that way.

This can be very difficult to heal because it takes many years to permanently rewire the neural pathways of the body-brain (meaning the neural connections that exist throughout our cerebral, digestive and heart circuits), as well as redesign the mental constructs of the psychological mind.

But it’s not impossible. Ongoing meditation is a really effective way to become conscious of the subconscious dysfunction that exists within all of us. Through becoming aware of our unhealthy architecture, over time we can literally change the physicality of our wiring in a process called neuroplasticity. The psychological word for this is psychotherapy, meaning we change our conceptual design for the purpose of healing and growing ourselves.

So regardless of the source, if we’re in a constant state of depression or anxiety it is our responsibility to emancipate ourselves from it. It’s a hard pill to swallow for many because they look to someone or something to blame, but this approach is always fruitless and disempowering. Simply, unless we take ownership of our healing and growth, then nothing will change.

Of course that doesn’t mean we should take responsibility for an event or person who inflicted suffering upon us, but our response to it is where we must take control. If we’ve perpetuated this suffering in a self-harming fashion over a long period of time, then that is a reality that we need to own.

For those who want to improve their psychological state, I really recommend you read ‘How to Get Out of the Rut of Self-Harming Thoughts and Feelings’. As I explained in that article:

“When our self-harm becomes a serious health issue, sometimes we are diagnosed with a disorder and prescribed medication. However, drugs aren’t the cure to these dysfunctional psychological states, they are simply a tool that assists a productive chemical balance so that the issue is easier to live with whilst we look for and undertake ways to resolve it.

What actually cures most, but not all, dysfunctional mental states is effective psychotherapy. Usually it is reserved for a professional to guide, however that is for severe cases or when a person can actually access them.

The truth is we can undertake psychotherapy on ourselves. We in fact already do it. Every time we have had insight into a problematic state of mind and undertook changes to remove or alter it, it was literally psychotherapy in action.”

When we experience disorders such as these they are both mental and physical. At all times there is a bottom-up and top-down influence, meaning that emotions or chemical cocktails influence our psychology, and mental states influence our physicality.

If serious harm is inflicted and reinforced over many years, it can have a significant impact on both our physical machinery and our psychological architecture. That’s why the longer it goes on, the longer it takes to rebalance it into a naturally healthy state.

This is exactly why self-administered psychotherapy is an area that needs to be taught in our schools. As an individual, we should be constantly reflecting on the innate power we have to heal and grow ourselves. This training should start from an early age, right through to the final stages of our third dimensional existence, so society in general is equipped with knowledge and skills of a therapeutic and developmental nature.

Final Thoughts

Life is an emotional roller-coaster ride, there’s no doubt about that. If we have a negative emotional reaction to our experience, there’s no need to suppress it; we should respond to it in the most functional and healthy way that we can.

After all, the goal should be at peace with life, not just be ‘happy’.

The belief that certain emotions are a problem is inaccurate because they are simply a natural aspect to being human. What we should refocus on however is the abuse of certain emotions, such as excessively feeding our sadness or anger, as well as the constant self-harm that many of us inflict on ourselves after we’ve experienced something that we have deemed ‘undesirable’.

With the right type of philosophical attitude we can learn from all of our experiences anyway, regardless if there is ‘justice’ to be had or not.

There is also a serious lack of empathy towards people who are suffering in a state of despair or confusion. For example, most people who are excessively controlling are being so because they are lost in some sort of trauma or fear.

It’s ‘pain-based’ behavior, not ‘conscious’ behavior.

Over the internet or face-to-face, we need to be more humane to those who are ignorant, abusive, arrogant or selfish. If we respond in an equally unsophisticated way – such as abuse an abuser or condemn a condemner – then all we do is reinforce their pain and little healing or growth is likely to occur.

It’s important for us to all take a serious chill-pill in this dark-age of despair, delusion, division and disharmony. The harsh reality is that most people really are unconscious soldiers of a socially-engineered agenda to maintain the dying control-matrix. When we have compassion for the way that these people have been designed to unconsciously feel – such as powerless, materially unsatisfied and in an existential state of suffering – then they have a greater chance of emancipating themselves from their pain and beginning a process of healing and growth.

And the more that occurs, the more we can heal and grow our collective consciousness.


Phillip J Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.

What a wild ride 2016 continues to be. The good news is that people continue to wake up in droves and it’s causing even the most highly indoctrinated to question the ‘beliefs’ they’ve been ‘designed’ with. Even the official 911 story is finally being questioned by those who never did their proper research, thanks to the recent Saudi Arabia debacle.

On the other hand, the shift is really hitting the fan. Examples include:

  • banks finally admitting serious fraud (such as money laundering and precious metal market fixing);
  • a culminating European refugee and banking crisis;
  • massive Australian and Chinese ‘private-debt’ and ‘housing’ bubbles;
  • increasing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East;
  • amplifying earthquakes and volcanic activity along the ring of fire; and
  • concerns over an escalating WWIII scenario, to cite but a few.

The list goes on and on.

Economic Collapse Vs Stagnation

Over the last several years however the primary concern is in regards to our failing fiat monetary system and the death of the US dollar (and the petrodollar). This really culminated mid last year and has only gotten more serious since, however the stock price manipulators (Plunge Protection Teams, corporations buying their own stocks and Central Bank activity) have been propping up this asset class which has recently given us the appearance that ‘everything is okay’.

If you’ve been watching, you would have noticed the global stocks have been bipolar in their behavior, crashing one month and high on life another. There has been a triple top in the US markets, which has some alternative economists and commentators calling the inevitable failure of the manipulation, because the house of cards is just too unstable.

Simply, the view in the alternative community is by far focused towards the slow death of the current western fiat system and many are stating that major changes will be happening in the very near future.

Considering that the fundamental or ‘main-street’ economy has continued to whither away, the global economic situation is simply nowhere near as great as we’ve been led to believe by the oligarchical-controlled media and the recent rise in stock prices. For example, Brazil, Russia, Canada, Venezuela and other national economies in recession, depression or experiencing hyperinflation are indicative of what could soon be a harsh reality throughout the rest of the world.

It is likely by mid 2016 it will finally be official that the US has been in a technical recession, even with their manipulated GDP and other data. Regardless, the global economy is clearly in a deflationary cycle. If this bottoms out in a global economic depression like that of the early 20th Century, then hyperinflation will likely occur across the world, just like it has in Venezuela.

However, in an interview with the notorious Professor Steve Keen a few weeks ago (embedded at the end of this article), he stated that they could keep this system going at a painfully stagnant rate, just like they have in Japan for so long. Others ferociously disagree with this analysis, particularly because of the massive derivatives bubble and other factors that didn’t relate to Japan’s situation all those years ago.

Steve admits that he isn’t an expert on derivatives; he focuses on private debt levels. So given he is an “anti-economist” in his own words, which means that he debunks the Keynesian approach to economic design, he is in the alternative camp with others who see the failure of our current economic design, which illustrates the internal division on what will happen and how to move forward.

Gold Standard Vs People’s Fiat

Steve also believes that going back to the gold standard is not the answer (where all currency is backed by gold). Given its failure in the roaring 20’s and the depression of the 30’s, his point may very well be justified. This view is also supported by Bill Still, who was recently interviewed at the SGT Report:

Many in the sovereignty movements believe in going back to the gold standard, but have they really considered the other option? The alternative potential is for the government (the people) to capitalize on the power we have to create money out of nothing. First, we must take away the illegitimate power of private banking institutions to do it, including all private central banks, and then legislate it to be done by the government solely for the benefit of the people and the environment.

As one example of a policy package already designed to achieve this, a political party in Australia has proposed two economic policies which ensure that the Government retakes it power to create an honest money supply, as well as guarantees that the multinational corporations pay their fair share in tax.

First is their monetary policy which stops private banks creating money out of nothing and ensures that the government creates the $120 billion needed each year to ensure that the debt which is repaid to the banks, as well as population growth, doesn’t result with deflation. This money will be immediately invested into asset-backed infrastructure, which embarrasses the $1.5 billion averaged each year for the last decade or so. The difference is staggering and would result in huge projects like high speed rail and pipelines built to green parts of the desert.

Second is that all taxes are to be removed (except import and export taxes) and replaced with a 2% debit-transaction tax. Given there are tens of trillions of dollars that move through the Aussie economy annually, all up these two policies would generate more than double the revenue currently received each year, with businesses and individuals only paying 2% tax. This is compared to up to 50% or more that some working class people pay when you include licences, registrations and taxes on land, fuel, alcohol etc etc.

These are truly revolutionary policies which deal with the toxicity and inequality of the system we have today, and coupled with their approaches to education, health, medicine, natural resources, environment, energy, permaculture, pensioners and many others, they should be immediately considered by political and community representatives from all around the world so that a mainstream dialogue can subsequently occur.

Helicopter Money

Further to the idea that the monetary ponzy scheme instituted by the oligarchs will be kept alive for quite a while longer, it’s important to consider that many truth-seeking economists and analysts were saying that the system was going to break before Quantitative Easing (QE) was invented after the great recession of 2008. Then QE came along to save the economy from a deflationary implosion – so the puppeteers could once again do something similar given the current contraction in the global economy.

A quick fix they might utilize to re-stimulate the economy is QE for the people, or helicopter money. What this means is that instead of creating money out of nothing and injecting it into the finance sector (QE), it is injected into main street (or all our personal bank accounts). This would need to be a coordinated strategy done by many governments of the world so that it doesn’t cause hyperinflation, and this money must be created by governments so that there is no debt attached to it.

It also should be used to pay off personal debt, whilst those with no debt can spend it into circulation.

Even if they do use this approach, the fact still remains that we need to do something comprehensive about this complete economic failure because the mainstream economy has been suffering for a decade now, and arguably longer. For example, we should not take the official unemployment rates seriously; the amount of people struggling to survive because they are either underemployed or have given up trying to find work is staggering. Poverty, homelessness, mental health issues and addiction is increasing all over the western world, whilst the middle class is rapidly shrinking.

These issues are a direct result of the unethical power that the shadow order has. Its a hard pill to swallow, but the system is designed to favor the banking and transnational corporations that control both our money supply, and our mainstream media. The disappointing aspect is that most politicians, media personalities and other famous social commentators have no idea of this fact, so its no wonder that they sound convincing when they spray misinformation which does not speak to this fundamental truth.

If they do understand it and choose not to speak up, then they will not be on the right side of history, nor do they have the courage and ethics to truly represent the needs of not just the people, but our natural systems too. We need real leaders who are prepared to make personal sacrifices in the name of truth, honor and sovereignty, not ill-informed or complicit mouthpieces of the social engineering agenda.

What Next?

So what will happen in terms of the global economy? It appears its anyone’s guess. Unless of course it’s a controlled demolition, then there are some who would know. There are a few voices saying the fundamentals are just too weak to keep this ponzy scheme going for too much longer and that the result might be a return to a gold standard just like the Eastern World appears to be preparing for with their gold accumulation and the Chinese creating a mirror to the London gold fix.

There are others however who say that the powers-that-will-no-longer-be will try to manipulate this system to survive until at least after the US election so they can get Hillary into power to maintain their goals of a one world government and a one world currency.

The US Election

The US Presidential Race is an absolute circus, especially because the delegates system is rigged, as is the electronic voting system which will be used as a fail-safe. Trump appears to have little policy substance, as well as a bigoted energy which is creating a lot of division, however he does speak some truth and hints towards taking the power from the Fed to create the US money supply (he says he will pay off the national debt in 8 years which is the only way he could do it).

Bernie is arguably the representative with the most truth, particularly around the unethical and illegal union between Wall Street and the US government, however his policy approach is considered by the free market advocates as one that will destroy the economy and issue in a socialist ideological framework. The latter is quite ironic actually considering we have had socialism for the rich policies for quite some time now.

In any case, as these two candidates appear to be anti-establishment, even with their alleged shortfalls they are clearly the best options.

That’s because on the other hand Clinton is an absolute criminal, a puppet for the establishment and a war-mongering psychopath. It’s unbelievable that she’s even allowed to run for President, so if she gets in (which is clearly the plan) then I hope that the American people will finally stand up and take back their power like they should have done a long time ago.

Don’t believe my word though; watch Abby Martin’s expert breakdown to understand who the real Hillary is:

Final Thoughts

Whilst the world wakes up, the world falls apart, and that’s a good thing. With more personal reasons for people to search out alternative information, this amplifies the crash of the matrix of control. Ultimately, we really have an unprecedented potential to emancipate ourselves from the economic and ideological enslavement that has characterized the hierarchical system since the conception of civilization.

Unfortunately however there is disunity within those who have woken up to the shadow power structure and the control system that has been established to maintain it. The truth we should all remember though is that we can disagree all we want about how to move forward into the short and long term future, but as long as we recognize the two primary mechanisms for control – namely the money supply and corporate media – then we have a space for uniting in action.

Then, we should remain open to the fact that we’ve all changed our views over time and that we’ll most likely continue to do so as we personally and collectively evolve.

In addition, the following interview is with Steve Keen. He explores the stagnation of the global economy and the bubbles in the Australian and Chinese debt and housing sectors, as well as the legitimacy of the Australian Sovereignty Party’s policy approach to the dishonest money supply and the tax evasion by big money. Enjoy and please share.


Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.

Image credit:

Industrial agriculture and its chronic use of toxic fertilizers and pesticides is causing humanity and our natural systems many serious problems.

As explained in the article ‘Permaculture – What is it and Why is it Important?‘:

It may have sped up the cultural evolution of humanity, but on a large and widespread scale it damages the natural world, including animal colonies such as bees, and has created a decline in the nutrient levels of the food it produces. It relies on fossil fuels, such as the oil required for machinery, fertilisers and pesticides. It kills the soil of its life, which includes bacteria, fungi, protozoa, nematodes, arthropods and earthworms. It essentially kills natural systems.

Industrial agriculture also requires high input for the associated output. Another important point is that it doesn’t even feed the local population; through free trade agreements food is unnecessarily shipped all over the globe and immorally misses the people who need it most, whilst so much waste is created in the so-called ‘developed’ nations. Industrialised farming simply has to go, for the death of it will be the conscious birth of humanity’s sustainable partnership with planet earth.

The transition from inorganic additives to purely organic ones is gaining momentum, but there is still a long way to go. In addition, it is an assumption within the organic food movement that because the fertilizers used are not from made from toxic synthetics, the food is more nutritious. This isn’t necessarily true. Even though organic ingredients are more aligned with the needs of the plant, as well as the soil, it’s ensuring the presence of the organisms that should be living in the soil which will provide the most nutritious food.

This is because plants get many of their essential nutrients from the dance they have with the life in the soil. Plants photosynthesize light into exudates (which are mostly sugar mixed with a little protein and carbohydrate) which they pump into the soil to attract specific microorganisms that they feed to create an exact balance of ingredients that they need to be fully healthy.

The Soil Food Web

As Elaine Ingham, the creator of The Soil Food Web, explains at the beginning of the following interview with ‘The Conscious Society‘ YouTube Channel:

The plant puts out the [signal] it wants to put out that will wake up the right sets of bacteria and fungi to do very specific jobs for that plant. So [for example] the plant needs nitrate, its going to put out an exudate that wakes up those bacteria and fungi that make enzymes that will pull that nitrogen straight out of the crystalline material of the rocks, the sands, the silts, the clays. There is no soil on this planet that lacks the nutrients to grow plants.

It’s just utterly ridiculous that we’re going around putting in inorganic fertilisers because your soil already contains all the nutrients that your plants can possibly use. They’re present in that soil. What we’ve destroyed in converting our soil into dirt has been that life that makes those nutrients available back to the plant.

Not only is inorganic farming and industrial agriculture turning our life-full soil into life-less dirt, it’s also causing a decrease in arable land. In fact, a study in 2015 found that 1/3 of arable land has been lost in only 40 years:

The continual ploughing of fields, combined with heavy use of fertilizers, has degraded soils across the world, the research found, with erosion occurring at a pace of up to 100 times greater than the rate of soil formation.

As further explained by Elaine in the below interview:

When we use inorganic fertilisers, we pour on one, or maybe two, in extreme cases we’ll put three of the nutrients that the plant is going to require, but all the rest of the nutrients are ignored. And everytime we put on an inorganic fertiliser it kills those organisms that will protect your root, that will pull the nutrients into that root zone and store them and keep them there.

If we destroy this life we have no way to build structure in the soil and therefore water does not infiltrate into the soil, instead your water runs off and it ends up causing erosion and it causes movement of your soil into your lakes and rivers and streams, destroying water quality.

Even if we switch to organic additives, it doesn’t necessarily mean that we’ve fixed the many issues caused by the synthetic chemical industry. As explained in this article:

Many people are demanding organic, based on political, nutritional, and environmental reasons. Implicit in the reason to return to natural production methods is the fact that beneficial organisms are killed by the use of toxic chemicals. This sets up toxic chemical users to need more and more and more toxic chemicals to maintain the system to the point that an addiction to those toxic chemicals is formed.

How do you “Just Say No” to that addiction? Switching from using synthetic chemical fertilizers and toxic pesticides to using organic products does not fix the problem caused by toxic chemicals. If we only use natural products that kill pests, weeds or diseases, the problem has not been solved, and the “organic grower” will not be successful. “The switch” must involve a wholly new approach, which requires working with nature, instead of combatting and fighting nature.

So how do we revitalize our soil on both an individual and community scale? The first step is to be familiarized with the practice of permaculture, which you will learn greatly about in the article ‘Permaculture – Reconnect with Nature, Supply Your Own Resources‘. In it the icon of Permaculture, Geoff Lawton, is interviewed.

In addition, watch this interview with Elaine for a detailed account of why and how to return to the right balance of life in our soil, plus so much more.

For further analysis on the failures of the industrial agricultural model, see the article ‘Hidden Costs of Industrial Agriculture‘.


Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.

First image credit:

When we collaborate, we’re strong. When we divide, we’re weak. With so many competing beliefs about what the problems are, as well as how to move forward, the various truth and sovereignty movements are struggling to unite. Therefore, we should make it an imperative to put our superficial differences to the side and work together for our common core cause: freedom.

Humanity is enslaved, whether we individually know it or not. Economically, educationally, psychologically, emotionally, medically, philosophically and spiritually – among many others – we have been hijacked by the corporatization of our world.

In response, there is an explosion of awakenings happening across our planet; some of us are waking up from our slumber and undertaking a process of emancipating our mind and heart from the social engineering that we’ve all been subject to. We definitely need to capitalize on it too. Make no mistake though; all of us still have ways in which we’re a slave to the matrix.

The Divisions

There are two primary areas that the divide and conquer strategy has been particularly effective; our conceptions on the nature of reality and our beliefs around what’s best for our future.

As an example, the way in which we design our social systems as we move forward is a contentiously debated issue, whilst another is the battle that rages on for theological supremacy. Both of these matters are distractions, as their focus is counter-effective for achieving our shared goals.

In terms of our specific ‘beliefs’ about the nature of God, surely we can agree that irrespective if we look at it ecologically, quantum physically or spiritually, we’re all intimately connected within an interdependent dance of life.

In this sense, we can simply choose to unite over our inherent unity.

And in regards to whom or what controls the world, that doesn’t matter either. As long as we accept that the primary mechanisms for control are the money supply and the matrix-media, then we can get on with taking back the power to economize our own societies, as well as disseminate the truth through our own independent mediums.

Another serious division is the way to deal with our encroaching and involuntary enlistment within a global totalitarian order. In response, many people believe that we need to reduce, legitimize and decentralize government and make it accountable to the sovereignty of the people, whilst the anarchist movement is adamant that zero government is the only way to go.

Personally I’m an anarchist at heart, although I see tremendous risk in removing the mechanisms which have the potential to safeguard the rights of the people, as well as the protection of our natural systems. Without an appropriate series of bodies to ensure this, why wouldn’t other monopolies and tyrannical structures continue to manifest?

They would, as they always have.

Plus, we are in a particularly fragile and vulnerable point in human history. With weapons developed that could wipe out a nation or region within minutes, of course there is a need to have appropriate defenses in place on national scales.

Ultimately, until the plethora of cultures on our planet have become enlightened enough to understand that harming others and their mother earth is literally harming themselves, then we need representative organizations on both national and global scales to ensure the safety and well-being of humanity and the environment.

Working within the System

Any bodies sanctioned with such tasks of course need to be transparent, accountable and based in love, truth and justice. This is unfortunately the opposite of what we have today in Western Governments and global organizations. But with the will of the people, it can and will be done.

As a necessary tangent, there is an interpretation of the word ‘Government’ that is floating within alternative media. It says that its etymology defines it as “to control the mind”. But is this actually true? As rebutted in this forum: Etymologically speaking, it might help to frame it as “a group that is of a mind/disposition to govern/lead” rather than “a group that controls minds.

In any case, the shadow-order which controls governments and the corporate media has done a fantastic job of brainwashing the masses into ignorant, apathetic and lazy agents of truth and justice. This is why so many people who are unplugging from the control system are angry that the governments have not done what they were designed to do: to be representative of the needs of the people. Instead, they’re representative of desires of the elite and corporate power structures.

For example, they have allowed our money supply to be taken over by these parasitic puppeteers. Instead of the insane profits – derived from the way money is created in society – being invested in social and environmental projects, they are funneled into the control of these minor few.

Governments of the world should never have allowed this to happen, so any anger towards them is more than justified.

Yet ironically, it’s an authentic governmental structure, not a corporation masquerading as a government, which is going to get us out of this mess. After all, most of the staff are just innocent people like you and me. To begin, politicians and bureaucrats need to be made aware that they’ve sold out against the future of their own nuclear and human families. Laws also need to be immediately realigned according to our fundamental rights.

Ultimately, humanity should no longer be controlled or ruled by anyone or any structure and we need a decentralized system to ensure this.

In the Name of Freedom

True anarchy means ‘no rulers’, not ‘chaos’. The latter is what we’ve been led to believe through the social engineering agenda, yet I’m sure we can all agree that the former is what humanity truly deserves. Yet counter to what many anarchists firmly believe, this doesn’t necessarily mean that it equates to no government; it can also mean that any governing authority is only sanctioned with that authority when its in alignment with the natural rights of all life on earth.

If this is compromised in any way, then the authority that was granted by the people can be immediately retracted and a new set of officials can be voted into those roles. In this system, a no tolerance approach to corruption and collusion should be encoded into its very fabric.

To achieve this, the people need to recognize that the so-called leaders of our world are either ignorant or complicit agents of the elite/corporate agenda and they must be held accountable for their lack of competence and/or corruption. Simply, without this understanding, the world is going to continue its fall into the new dark age of deception, dysfunction, division and disharmony.

An Efficient Path to Freedom

Once again, all we need to do is unite and we could fix this mess almost overnight. There are so many movements that if they all joined forces, we would swiftly deal with the corporatization, authoritarianism and militarization of our world. Examples include:

  • Environmentalists;
  • Libertarians;
  • Anarchists;
  • New Ageists;
  • Alternative Media;
  • Permaculture People;
  • Vegans and Vegetarians;
  • Free Market advocates;
  • Charity workers;
  • Religious Supporters;
  • Etc etc…

If this was to occur, and the masses were made aware of the growing unification of individuals and organizations which vehemently reject the elitist and corporatist takeover of not just our money supply, but our governments and resources too, then the tipping point would occur almost instantly and a peaceful uprising would naturally ensue on a global scale.

Simply, if we can come to the agreement that our freedoms are being stripped from us at an alarming rate, and that we’re destroying our natural systems on an unprecedented scale at the same time, then we have a common platform to team up and collectively deal with the issues that we all face.

Yet this is unlikely to happen because the harsh truth is that very few people have gotten close to the complete picture. Even many within the truth and sovereignty movements lack a holistic understanding. Some just focus on their spiritual ‘high’, others just ‘hate’ on the shadow power brokers and an even greater amount are lost in their own emotional, psychological and philosophical dysfunction.

That leads to another serious divide and conquer strategy that is rarely spoken of: the conflict of the self. Too many individuals are focused on their own baggage made of engineered desires, a disconnection from their external realm and an overwhelming sense of powerlessness.

This has been so effective at stealing their focus that they’ve been unwilling to put their perceived issues to the side, realize that there’s a bigger picture than their own woes and begin a process of giving back to their human family.

These are in effect, the sleeping masses.

Final Thoughts

Predictably, the entitlement culture and misplaced individualism which has been amplified by materialism and consumerism has had a damaging impact on the capacity for humanity to stand up and make use of its collective power. Now, before the anti-collectivists get their knickers in a knot, I should make it super clear that all actions should be based on the sovereignty of individuals. Any group which manifests from this should be a voluntary arrangement and aligned to the simplicity of natural law.

But we are a natural part of a collective, whether we like it or not. That collective is called life on planet earth and we all have a responsibility to contribute to its ongoing survival if we want to ensure our own and our children’s survival too.

Simply, we’re all facing the same chronic toxicity and impeachments on our sovereignty, so regardless of how much we scream “poor me”, if we don’t scream for the “freedom of we”, then we’re not going to get anywhere.

Unquestionably we’ll fail, epically.

Of course we should live a life of self-determination, but if we’re neglecting to consciously and practically join the collective force that we were born into, the inherent damage on our individual freedoms is hypocritically and abundantly clear.

And that’s not the type of abundance we should aim to achieve in our collective future.

Note: For a comprehensive list of progressive policies which speak to all these issues, as well as holistically align with the truth and sovereignty movements, see the impressive policy arsenal of the Australian Sovereignty Party (feel free to join the party no matter where you live in the world, as well as advocate these policies to your own community and political representatives).


Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.

Image Credit:

Let’s make one thing super clear: those who both support and condemn vaccinations have one striking similarity – they both want what’s best for our kids.

The problem is though, this whole fiasco has become a giant mess.​ The public debate is diluted, unfocused, emotional and abusive; both camps will sometimes even accuse each other of being ‘child killers’ and it has even fallen to the depths of a pro-vaxer saying “May your children die of a communicable disease”.

We’re not going to get anywhere whilst we act domestically violent towards each other. There is simply no need for verbal or emotional abuse; we just need to reconsider our own and each other’s views so that we can refresh the dialogue to achieve what we all want – a safer and healthier introduction to the world for our future generations.

So to begin, is there a difference between immunisation and vaccination? Yes, there is.

Vaccinations are the injection of agents into the body which could potentially result in that person being immunised against a particular disease. Do all vaccinations then immunise?

No, they don’t; occurrences and outbreaks can manifest in children that are vaccinated.

In addition, vaccines contain much more than just the antigen that is injected to immunise against a specific disease. For a comprehensive list of vaccines and their ingredients, as well as the potential side-effects to those ingredients, see this excellent summary.

As an introduction, this Natural News article notes that:

“Today’s vaccines not only contain live versions of the diseases you DO NOT WANT, but also contain GMOs, hormones from infected cows, pigs, chickens and monkeys, untested virus combinations (like H1N1), aluminum, mercury, emulsifiers, and crossbred bacteria from animals, mosquitoes, and diseased humans.”

The truth is that it’s less argued within the anti-vax movement that immunisation agents are harmful for our health, but more that it’s the other ingredients which are. So who makes the decisions for the addition of these other questionable ingredients to the vaccinations that are injected into our kids – some which are scientifically proven to cause disease?

Questioning Credibility

In general, on one side there are the so-called experts and laymen who support blanket vaccinations which are developed by the pharmaceutical monopolies, and on the other side there are those who condemn vaccinations for their alleged role in the death and disability of an undisclosed amount of children.

Both sides ironically believe they have the science that proves themselves right. So, why is there contradicting evidence around such a critical issue?

Anybody with any knowledge on the state of the medical industry will know that it has long been corrupted by big money and big pharma. It is important that we start off with this established truth, because we have to understand that the pharmaceutical-industrial complex will one day be looked at by the mainstream mentality exactly as we look at the tobacco industry now: deceptive, fraudulent, criminal and unethical.

For example, this Collective Evolution article captures important information on so-called peer-reviewed research:

“In the past few years more professionals have come forward to share a truth that, for many people, proves difficult to swallow. One such authority is Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.

Dr. Horton recently published a statement declaring that a lot of published research is in fact unreliable at best, if not completely false.

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

In the same article, there is another confronting quote by a medical journal editor:

“Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor in Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), which is considered to another one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, makes her view of the subject quite plain:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”

In addition, this article captures a scientist who needed to come clean:

“CDC Senior Scientist William Thompson has alleged that a 2004 study he co-authored omitted key data that would have revealed a link between autism and a commonly-required childhood vaccine, MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella).

“I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism,” said Thompson in a statement issued through his attorney Wednesday.

Moving on, a Harvard study published in the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, states that:

“An extensive range of studies and lawsuits already documents strategies by which pharmaceutical companies hide, ignore, or misrepresent evidence about new drugs; distort the medical literature; and misrepresent products to prescribing physicians.”

The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) is the US body which claims to be:

“responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.”

Yet, they don’t exactly have a good track record. For example, a Global Research article states that:

“The FDA continues to be one of the most dangerous government agencies in the United States. The sheer scope of people it affects with its corruption is staggering. As Jon Rappoport has highlighted, the FDA’s own webpage admits that the drugs it certifies as safe contribute to over 100,000 deaths per year.”

In this article titled ‘FDA’s Own Scientists Describe Intimidation Of Big Pharma‘, it states:

“A survey of 997 FDA scientists revealed that forty percent feared “retaliation” for voicing safety concerns over prescription drugs in public. Over one-third of the scientists didn’t even feel safe expressing safety concerns inside the agency, behind closed doors!”

As mentioned, FDA approved drugs kill tens of thousands of people annually. Even more ironically, an FDA document admits that the Tripedia vaccine could potentially result with autism, among many other medical issues.

Regardless, it’s clear from the above evidence that the credibility of so-called medical science has been compromised and therefore its validity should not be blindly accepted by Governments or the people.

The Reduction of Disease

It is claimed by pro-vaxers that vaccinations have reduced the contraction of various diseases, but is this even true? Those who argue that improvements in sanitation, hygiene, sewerage infrastructure, nutrition and anti-biotics were the true cause of declining disease, usually refer to something similar to the following chart.

​Who’s right? You decide.


The Increase of Disease

Follows is a chart showing the rise of Autism:


The official story is that Autism prevalence actually hasn’t increased, it’s just that diagnostic and other processes have been better refined. But is this true? As stated in the article ‘Evaluating Change in Autism Prevalence: Change We Can Believe In?‘ (authored by Alycia Halladay and Michael Rosanoff from the Autism Speaks Science Team):
“Factors such as younger age of diagnosis, broadening of diagnostic criteria, improvements in the availability of services, and better awareness of the disorder have all been attributed to the change in autism prevalence. However, recent epidemiological studies indicated that, while these factors do account for a portion of the change, they cannot account for all of the increase alone (see Figure which was adapted from a presentation by Dr. Peter Bearman at the meeting).”

Regardless of what is causing this epidemic, surely we can all agree this is a real issue that we need to take seriously. As a side note, see this chart that maps the rise in Autism with the rise in Glyphosate:

This might be related, it might not, but surely we can also agree that robust investigation should result. Furthermore, other forms of disease are increasing too, such as allergies and obesity:


Then of course there’s cancer:


Ultimately, we can all unite on the fact that there is a problematic rise in disease and other health issues, as well as that it’s of serious concern. We must be authentic and transparent with our approach to identifying the causes of these issues, including thoroughly investigating the impacts of vaccinations. Otherwise, we’re just ignorant, hypocritical and emotionally-unregulated mouthpieces of big pharma propaganda.

The Conflicting Science

Collective Evolution has been one of the leaders in the alternative media who have been documenting the debate on vaccinations, as well as the competing science. It is highly recommended that every person, especially parents, read their article called ‘The Top 6 Reasons Why Parents Should Never be Forced to Vaccinate their Children‘.

In it, among many other points, they cite scientific evidence both for and against the allegation that vaccinations cause Autism:

“As you can see above, there are many peer-reviewed studies published in scientific journals by experts at various institutions claiming no link. On the other hand, we have the same type of research, also in abundance that claims there could be a link, and that it is probable – and through science they’ve shown how.

What are parents who do their research supposed to think when they come across this information? Why is the “pro vac side” so adamant on saying that there are no scientific peer-reviewed published studies that posit a potential link to autism – when there are many.

So, this is one reason why parents are choosing not to vaccinate their children. To say there is absolutely no way a vaccine can be a contributing factor in causing autism is completely false and dangerous.”

The Conflicting View Of Doctors

This article at Global Freedom Movement is an excellent introduction to the recent Centers For Disease Control (CDC) scandal, as well as a long list of quotes by medical professionals who have been courageous enough to tell their unpopular perspective regarding vaccinations:

“Are we ready and willing to grow up and acknowledge the literally hundreds of doctors and scientists who have changed their minds on vaccination due to carrying out their own serious investigation, or are we going to echo the mindless refrain of unconscious politicians like Jill Hennessy and Daniel Andrews who dismiss ALL of the above doctors and scientists as quacks on the internet?”

The Vaccine Court Payouts

Most people are unaware there was a vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) set up in the US in 1986. The following four articles will help you understand its role, as well as the payouts to the victims of vaccine injury, disability and death:

The Vaxxed Controversy

Controversy surrounding the movie ‘Vaxxed: From Cover Up to Castastrophe’ being played at the Tribeca Film Festival has passionately ignited the public debate once again. Or should I say, ignited unsophisticated attacks, ignorant accusations and immature abuse.

In another sharp article by Global Freedom Movement, the author suggested that De Niro always knew that the movie wouldn’t be screened at Tribeca:

“Tribeca disappointment aside, we have Robert De Niro to thank for turning VAXXED into a major media soundbite and turning it into a conversation piece for millions of people. What if he knew all along that TRIBECA’s sponsors would never willingly allow VAXXED to instigate the “conversation” that De Niro wished to take place around the autism-vaccine link?

And yet, now – possibly because of calculated shrewdness on De Niro’s part – the name of this very important documentary, Vaxxed: From Cover Up To Catastrophe, has been beamed into the lounge rooms of not just Americans, but those all around the world—multiple times! The old adage, “There is no such thing as bad publicity” rings true, and it is likely that Robert De Niro is but one person in a team of amazing people who deserve our immense gratitude for enabling this to happen.”

This might very well be the case, which is why it’s important that we all watch it and decide for ourselves if it is a relevant contributor to the debate or not. For a short review of the Vaxxed film, watch this video by ‘We Are Change‘, an independent media outlet who continues to expose the false narratives of the dying matrix-media:

Final Thoughts

It’s clear that the masses have been brainwashed into blindly believing the official narratives on not just the supposed safety of vaccines, but also many other critical topics. The lamestream media has been fully exposed as a corporate and elitist propaganda tool for many years now, so why would the truth about vaccinations be any different?

Clearly we all want what’s best for our children. Many people who are anti-vaccination would no doubt be pro-immunisation if the only ingredient contained in the injection was the specific agent that’s required to immunise against a disease, such as Whooping Cough. So why can’t these options be provided for parents who only want to inject a particular antigen in their children? What alternative ways exist to immunise children without needing to inject a cocktail of toxic materials?

There’s no doubt that mechanistic medicine has made some wonderful achievements over the last century – especially surgery, anti-biotics and painkillers. But that doesn’t mean that it’s without flaw; it’s become obvious to any person who takes an independent look at the evidence that the medical and pharmaceutical industries have become corporatized and institutionalized, as well as laced with corruption, immorality and illegality.

They have also completely missed the point of preventative and holistic approaches to health.

Therefore, why should we trust this industry? Why shouldn’t the entire vaccination schedule be put on the table to be investigated by truly independent researchers who have no affiliation whatsoever to big pharma or the government? And until such time, shouldn’t all policies coercing people into vaccinating their children – such as that recently instituted in Australia – be immediately withdrawn?


This circus has gone on long enough. It is time for the masses to wake up and understand that they cannot trust the official stories that they’ve been told. We need to come together as a united force and demand that the entire pharmaceutical industry, including vaccines, needs to be robustly assessed to determine fact from fiction, once and for all.

Then and only then, a well educated populace can rightfully choose if they personally want to immunise their children, or not.


Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.

If you still think that Western Governments aren’t controlled by a shadow order, such as the banking dynasty and other special interests, then you’re still an engineered advocate for the control system.

In fact, many of your beliefs about the world are most likely false. No matter if you look at your philosophical or systemic beliefs, you’ve been purposely dumbed down by the matrix media to endorse a series of false narratives that perpetuate a system designed for the benefit of a few.

You’re not alone though, so don’t freak out; most politicians, doctors, teachers, academics, journalists and fellow human beings are not aware of their own perceptual and economic enslavement too. Once you truly accept that the beliefs you have are either inaccurate or incomplete, you then need to begin a process of reprogramming yourself to awaken to the deeper truths of your world (like all of us need to do).

And it’s easy too, once you put your pride to the side.

From this point, this article will number some of the bigger pictures that you personally need to investigate to come to your own well-informed opinion. This will not be a ‘this way or the highway’ approach; it is more of a guide to encourage its readers to do their own follow up research.

In addition, please be reminded that the mainstream media – which besides the monetary system is the primary mechanism of control – should NOT be relied on as a bearer of truth because it is more a reflection of the social engineering agendas that characterise living in this day and age. Alternatively, if you want to come to a perspective that is more closely aligned to the truth, then you have no option but to navigate the independent channels that feature the growing number of independent journalists.

Good luck though; it’s a mind-field.

  1. Your Controllers

There are many secret societies and elite think-tanks who are accused of having primary control of the world. There are many families who are accused of the same. There are also three ideologies that are primarily mentioned when discussing the shadow power structure, namely the Zionists, the Jesuits and the Khazarian Mafia.

Yet regardless of where our personal research leads in terms of who the so-called elite are, it’s unlikely that we’re ever going to expose the individuals behind the curtain. Seriously, we could argue all day about who is really in control – and each show evidence to support our claim – yet it doesn’t achieve what we actually need to do.

That doesn’t mean that we ignore the amounting evidence of who is who, but the fact remains that the monetary system and the banking institutions, as well as politics in general, are primarily controlled by this oligarchical power structure. And because they control how money is ‘created’ in society, they also secretly govern the way in which society is organised.

What matters is that we band together and say NO to this system of control and begin to retake our money supply so that we can collectively design the way in which we move forward into our future, both economically and socially. For a simple but confronting video that demonstrates how the money supply is controlled in the US (as well as most of the world), watch this short documentary by Mike Maloney called ‘The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind – Who Owns The Federal Reserve?':

  1. Your Enslavement

As eloquently evidenced by the above video, the 99.9% are enslaved economically. In this or another form, it has been the case for most of our recorded history. Some people also convincingly argue that money itself is a form of enslavement, which will be elaborated on later in this article.

In any case, with the rise of the uniting global culture (fuelled by the instantaneous sharing of information via the world-wide web), we now have a genuine shot at ending our economic enslavement by taking back the innate rights we share to be sovereign beings within sovereign communities.

The reality is however, the governments of the world have not yet taken this monetary control system seriously and are therefore conduits for this agenda. They should of course be employees of the people to ensure that their true needs are met, but this has simply not occurred. The ironic aspect is that most political, military and police personnel, as well as academics and other influential figures, just don’t understand that they themselves are outright facilitating the expansion of this cancerous system.

For more, watch the following short video by Larken Rose called ‘The Jones Plantation’. It is a metaphorical reflection on the evolution of slavery:

  1. Your Human Identity Versus Your Legal Identity

Did you know that your birth certificate is a contract with a corporation masquerading as a government? This legal identity is called a Strawman, whilst your flesh and blood identity is called a Freeman. Instead of reinventing the wheel, simply watch this short mind-blowing clip for more:

For a more in-depth analysis of how the Strawman came to exist, watch this snapshot:

  1. Your Future

The way it unfolds for humanity really is up to the people, not their so-called controllers. Why? Because our actions inevitably determine our destiny.

The unfortunate reality we now face is more war. With the oligarchs continuing to provoke those nations opposed to their hegemony – such as Russia, China and other BRICS countries – World War 3 is becoming increasingly likely. If you’re not up to speed with this dangerous geopolitical chess game, listen to a recent interview of former US Assistant Treasury Secretary, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts:

If we stand back and do nothing, they’ll continue to employ their carnage to achieve their agenda of a New World Order. Don’t believe that’s their plan? Listen to their own quotes:

You might ask, what’s wrong with a global governance? The answer is simple: tyranny. When you have that much centralisation of power, it will always be corrupted to benefit those who control it. Just look at where we’ve arrived today and it is easy to understand that power needs to be decentralised, and then relocalised, for most decision-making to occur at the community level.

Of course it’s sensible to have global agreements – such as intelligent and ethical ways to manage nuclear power and weaponry, as well as environmental and other concerns – but governments (and their growing self-imposed mandates) has stopped working for the benefit of the people, so imagine the difficulty of doing it on a planetary scale.

With the right safeguards, however, this can and will be reinstated on national and local scales in a decentralised and restricted way.

Many groups argue for removing the government entirely, but that’s missing the point, because it will expose us to the same threats. We need to have a mechanism which ensures the protection of our rights and the protection of the environment. Without this mechanism, other tyrannies and monopolies will always arise, ending with the impediment of our basic human rights. It really is that simple.

Therefore, the governmental structure needs to be cleansed of its infiltration by the oligarchs and other systemic corruption, and then restructured to fulfill its original purpose. Bruce Lipton in this quick video explains how the government is like the central nervous system for the cells of the body and to remove this instrument, and not just its corruption, is like throwing the baby out with the bathwater:

As an example of what changes need to occur in the policies of governments, read ‘Governments, Terrorism, Money, Education and Other Important Discussions‘. In it there are basic examples of the shifts we need to take in terms of monetary, taxation, education, media, energy, health, drug, housing, food, environment, immunisation and sovereignty policy.

For further information on solutions to these and other issues, watch this interview with the President of the Australian Sovereignty Party. If our governments and politicians had the insight, intelligence and morality to undertake such a revolution in their own policy arsenal, then we would literally create a new and improved society within a matter of weeks:

Let’s not forget though that the capitalist model has inherent contradictions that no matter how hard we attempt to flush out inequality in opportunity and the consolidation of power, as well as install the tenets of free market ideology, we still operate within an economy of scarcity which naturally manifests the monopolisation of resources. This means that tools to survive are for sale, which isn’t exactly an ethical approach towards humanity’s future. For a deeper analysis of why capitalism was always doomed to fail, watch this new video at Abby Martin’s ‘Empire Files‘:

So, what do we do about all this mess in the long term? The question naturally becomes: if not an economy of scarcity, then what? The simplest answer is of course an economy of abundance.

This means that currency and money is completely removed and all the materials humanity needs to survive are provided for free. This is really only possible by the automation of jobs by computers, robotics and advanced machinery, but we’re quickly heading in that direction anyway. If individuals want to then thrive, it will be a personal decision, where the opportunity to do so is easily accessible.

There are several different models which have been designed to achieve this, which are best summarised as resource-based economies. The three main angles on this idea are heralded by Michael Tellinger (the Ubuntu Movement), Peter Joseph (Zeitgeist) and Jacque Fresco (The Venus Project). However, Michael Tellinger’s approach is the only one with a political arm and is contesting the Municipal elections in South Africa in 2016.

Therefore, the idea of a resource-based economy does have a chance of becoming a reality in the short-term future, something that is beyond the imagination of most people. Whether or not he is successful, it’s important that we all at least have a basic awareness of what this concept represents. In the following video I interview Michael where he elaborates on the Ubuntu philosophy and how he aims to translate it into practice:

Final Thoughts

Have you ever considered any of the above information? If not, then its a reflection of how much you’re a product of social engineering. Essentially, you think what they want you to think.

It might be tough to hear, but do you want to become a truly independent thinker, or do you want to continue to have your head in the sand? Do you want to be a part of the solution to the woes of the world, or do you want to continue to be part of the problem?

The choice is yours, so choose wisely. Of course the information herein is not designed to dictate your own beliefs, but it is designed to encourage you to question all that you think you know, as well as explore concepts that you’ve never before considered.

Ultimately, we are in control of our future. Because the masses are deeply embedded into the programming of the oligarchs, it’s not looking good in the short term. But it’s not all despair; there continues to be an increasing number of individuals who are disengaging from the lullaby narratives and joining a faction of society who continues to mobilise to take back our self-determination.

And that is none other than our natural right.

Note: Let’s hope this rebellion can unite – no matter the differences in their beliefs about how to move forward – to create a peaceful uprising that ensures the health, happiness and honour of ourselves, and our future generations. Now that’s a revolution worth standing for.


Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.

10 966

The elite power structure – which uses the monetary system, war, false flags and the monopolized media as their primary mechanisms of control – has infiltrated every major government of the Western World. How do we know this? It’s simple; if they hadn’t been hijacked, then governments would have already begun a process of revolutionizing the way in which our societies are organized so that it benefits all of us, not just a select few.

The US Presidential race and two of its candidates have shown a small amount of hope for real change in America, something that not just its citizens desperately need, but the entire world too. Once the game is changed in the US – so that the government no longer works for those in control of the multinational and banking corporations – it will undoubtedly reverberate around the world.

Clinton is obviously a mouthpiece of the status quo and therefore cannot be trusted to enact real change. After all, she is an oligarch. On the other hand, Sanders and Trump appear to be anti-establishment, but are they really? It’s difficult to really know, because they could be controlled opposition. Yet even if they are separate to the existing order, can we really trust that they’ll do the job that the world’s peoples, and the environment, truly need?

Actions always speak louder than words, so regardless of the rhetoric of Trump and Sanders, does their policy agenda actually align to the truths that have been exposed by the many independent social researchers who are doing a wonderful job for the betterment of humanity?

Read below and decide for yourself.

The Real Policies for Change

This list is by no means exhaustive, but it reflects the fundamental shifts that we should be implementing in the short term to move into a new era of health and prosperity for humanity, and the environment we inhabit. In other words, these changes are the first essential steps if we want to overcome the dysfunction and deception that plague the hearts and minds of the people, as well as the systems that guide our collective activity.

If a political party or politician does not discuss these topics in general, then they are not aligned to the changes that we need, and therefore true progress. This is most likely because of two reasons; ignorance and/or corruption.

In any case, the exact way forward in each area is of course open for debate, but there must be an open and transparent dialogue held among the people. Simply, we all need to understand not just the issues, but the potential solutions to them.

This is obviously happening within conscious circles and progressive movements, however it’s not yet active within the mainstream mentality. This is just more evidence which illustrates that our politicians have failed us; that’s because it’s their job to bring these issues to the light of day so that everybody can participate in their resolution, if they so choose.

1. Monetary Policy: The way the economy is designed must rid society from the saturation of debt, move beyond indebtment to the oligarchs, cease the creation of fake currency by banks, overcome economic slavery by making the currency supply one of value and guarantee that local economies prosper.

2. Taxation Policy: The tax burden put on the people and the evasion of tax by multinational corporations needs to be resolved. One such method is abolishing all taxes and implementing a 2% debit-transaction tax so that citizens pay less tax, all individuals and businesses pay their fair share and there is an abundance of revenue to heal the wounds of a decaying society.

3. Budgeting Policy: Government revenues must be effectively and efficiently utilized to ensure the development of robust social services, increased wealth equality, the eradication of poverty, widespread sustainable practices, appropriate national defense programs and necessary infrastructure.

4. Defense and Foreign Policy: With unjust wars and false flag terrorism being the norm of the 21st Century, any decision to go to war must be sanctioned by the people via referendum. The reasons must be transparentally documented and validated as based in truth. All events at home and abroad that impact the decision-making of defense and foreign relations must be subject to robust and open investigations. Because national security is the first priority, all international relations should be treated diplomatically as the first line of defense.


Mainstream Media

5. Media Policy: The way in which information is disseminated throughout society must not be managed by monopolies, or a government. Media must be an open source platform where independent investigations are implemented and presented without bias. Any monopoly on the media must be disassembled so that the populace has unrestricted access to all the information necessary for the health and well-being of each individual and the community as a whole.

6. Education Policy: The way in which our children are educated is an indoctrination into the status quo, particularly economically and politically. The education system must therefore ensure that all children exercise their right to gain access to information that will help them to grow into healthy, happy and honorable adults, as well as question the way in which we organize society so that we can evolve it in alignment with our needs.

7. Governmental Policy: The amalgamation of government and business needs to be dissected. Politicians and bureaucrats are servants of the people and therefore must be representative of the needs and wants of the people. Moreover, government intervention of individual liberty and the free market must be also reduced.

8. Energy Policy: There is no longer any need to rely on fossil fuels, so creating the energy that society needs must be replaced with renewable resources – such as solar, air, water, wave, plant and free-energy technologies. Energy must also be made cheaply available to the public.

9. Health Policy: All foods and so-called medicines which impact the long-term health of the people must be labelled appropriately. Health programs that support emotional, psychological, philosophical, physical, spiritual, social and behavioral vitality must also be deeply embedded into schooling and other educational platforms. Holistic and preventative approaches to dis-ease must also be brought to the forefront of health education instead of relying on a symptomatic and prescriptive medical framework.

10. Medicine Policy: The pharmaceutical monopolies must be transformed into meeting the needs of the people, not shareholders and their profits. All natural and cheap remedies to disease – such as plant-based medicines and meditation – must be fully documented and reincorporated back into health education.

11. Housing Policy: Every person has a right to live in safe, comfortable and affordable housing. No individual should be homeless, unless by choice. Employment and Housing Policy must also be designed to ensure that the purchase of land is affordable and achievable for all.

12. Food Policy: The damaging impacts of industrial agriculture on earth’s natural systems, as well as the erosion of local economies (which is the direct result of trade agreements that primarily benefit the multinationals), needs to be reversed. One such way is by replacing it with a localized/regionalized Permaculture model where individuals and communities are supported to grow their own produce. This will help to increase local employment, as well as reconnect people to nature, the food they eat and their health requirements. In addition, all foods must be properly labelled and contain no toxic ingredients. GMOs must also be abandoned and organic foods must be readily available.

13. Water Policy: All citizens have a right to access safe and clean water. They should be supported to capture their own water needs. Where this is not possible, no toxins such as fluoride will be added to the water supply.

14. Animal Policy: All animal agriculture systems must respect the health and happiness of those animals. They must not subject them to any conditions in which they consistently suffer. One particular approach would be to incorporate it into a widespread permaculture model, in which animals are treated humanely.

15. Environmental Policy: Any practice that is environmentally unsustainable and negatively impacts the health and diversity of our natural systems is to be transformed into the opposite. The increasing extinction of animal and plant life must be reversed, as well as the trends of deforestation, ocean acidification and desertification.

16. Drug Policy: The war-on-drugs has been an epic failure because it has generated more crime, addiction, mental health problems and sent the market underground. It has also stigmatized the natural right to explore one’s own body and consciousness. The therapeutic and developmental aspects of so-called illegal drugs must be holistically researched so that society can be educated on both their positive and negative impacts. All illegal substances must be made legal, as they have begun to do in some countries, and a thoroughly-informed society must have safe access to pure substances for their own therapeutic, developmental and leisurely needs.

17. Sovereignty Policy: All citizens have natural rights, some of which have eroded through the recent policies of Western Governments. One example is privacy and another is the right to protest. This stripping of our rights needs to immediately stop and all rights aligned with natural law are to be reintroduced. No flesh and blood person should be treated as a legal fiction that works for a corporation impersonating as a government. This means that no legislation can impede on the natural laws that all individuals have a right to exercise.

18. Immunization Policy: All vaccines must be robustly studied independent of the pharmaceutical industry and the results made available to the public. All previous disease and death resulting from vaccines must also be publicly available. None will contain any ingredients other than to immunize against a specific disease. In addition, no child or adult will be forced or coerced into taking vaccines; every person must have their natural right to choose intact.

19. Atmospheric Policy: All geoengineering and chemical spraying programs are to immediately cease. The impacts that these programs have already had on the health of humanity, as well as the environment, must be holistically investigated and reversed.

20. Social Security Policy: Pensioners, people with a disability and other persons who require financial support must be treated with respect and must be able to comfortably live above the poverty line. Where possible, they will be supported to increase their education, training and skills so that they reenter the workforce. There should also be widespread volunteering programs with inherent incentives so the knowledge, skills and services of the elderly can be utilized for the benefit of the community.

Further Thoughts

There are many more areas that need to evolve, but its important to focus on the priorities in such as short piece. No doubt, many of you reading this would have been shocked and confused by some of the information herein. You might have even rejected elements to it, because it might have seemed too conspiratorial or challenging to believe. That’s okay; every single one of us who have woken up to these realities felt the same the first time we heard them too.

In any case, if you’d like to do follow up research, the links provided above will help you to initiate the process. Go deep too; it’s only when we individually undertake our own independent and robust research that we can come to a solid understanding of the true state of the world. The tip of course is to not be fooled by the propaganda narratives of the matrix-media and ensure we undertake research through the independent channels and progressive social researchers.

Furthermore, the above plans of attack are designed for the short to mid term. This does not discount the deeper agenda of moving from an economy of scarcity, to one of abundance. There are many models to achieve this, such as several resource-based economies, but until we build the foundations and start moving in that direction we have to work with what’s in front of us, right now.

In addition, of course it’s necessary to build new systems outside of the existing model to make the old ones redundant, yet we still need to use the systems that we’ve got and aim to transform society from within. After all, a balanced and holistic approach, is always the right approach.

Final Thoughts

Never has a government exposed all of the above issues. They might touch on some of them to some degree, but unfortunately we don’t have so-called leaders who actually call out the real challenges that we collectively face. There’s no doubt that some politicians know about these actualities, but the reality is they don’t publicly disclose it in fear of losing their credibility, or their livelihood.

But things are changing. Not only are more and more people joining the awakening community by educating themselves and taking action in response to these dysfunctions, but there are also political parties forming who dare to expose these truths to their audience and design robust policies in response. One such group is The Australian Sovereignty Party (ASP); in fact, many of the links above will direct you to the policies they’ve designed to rectify the failures of past governments.

Many parties around the world could learn a thing or two from this political force.

If you’re Australian, I highly encourage you to read the policy material at their website and join if their ethos resonates with you. Any person from around the world can join as an affiliate member too, so anyone is more than welcome to sign up to learn about how a true political party works. In addition, share this article and the ASPs progressive policies among your friends and family so that the momentum builds to bring Australians (and others) up-to-date with a political outfit that actually represents the real needs of you, me and all of us.

If you also believe in transforming our world into a better place, then at the very least research their policies. I know you’ll be pleasantly surprised (view their website here and follow them on facebook here). Furthermore, following is an interview I did with the President of the ASP, Daniel Huppert. In it he discusses many of the issues found in this article and the ASPs policy response to them. Enjoy.


Phillip J. Watt lives in Australia. His written work deals with topics from ideology to society, as well as self-development. Follow him on Facebook or visit his website.